This site is reader-supported. When you click through links on our site, we may be compensated.
<strong>A commissioner at the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has said that the official regulation of cryptocurrencies could actually stunt the technology’s development. Hester Peirce’s comments come at a time when the SEC has been accused of acting contrarily and gives hope to those wanting governments to take a step back to prevent over-regulation</strong>
Allowing the Technology to Come Into Its Own
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commissioner Hester Peirce was speaking at the University of Missouri School of Law on Feb. 8 when she hinted that government regulation could actually cause the crypto industry difficulties. The lawyer, who has been nicknamed the “Crypto Mom” for her generally positive comments towards cryptocurrencies, said that it may be a better idea for regulators to step back and allow blockchain projects to mature, and that hastily drawn up regulations could harm the industry:
We might be able to draw clearer lines once we see more blockchain projects mature. Delay in drawing clear lines may actually allow more freedom for the technology to come into its own.
Peirce further added that the SEC could at times be overly negative towards cryptocurrencies, and that this is something that needs to change: “We rightfully fault investors for jumping blindly at anything labeled crypto, but at times we seem to be equally impulsive in running away from anything labeled crypto. We owe it to investors to be careful, but we also owe it to them not to define their investment universe with our preferences.”
Diverse Perspectives Needed
Peirce’s comments come at a time when the SEC’s views on cryptocurrencies haven’t been wholly clear. Last year the SEC rightly took enforcement action against initial coin offerings and other crypto companies perpetrating fraud. But, as Peirce noted, this doesn’t mean regulators and government agencies should be automatically skeptical about everything to emanate from the cryptocurrency sector.
As Angela Walch, a professor of law at St. Mary’s University School of Law and a research fellow at the Centre for Blockchain Technologies at University College London previously said, it is important for regulators to have a “diverse perspective,” as all too often they can be overly focused on protecting the financial system and indifferent to innovation and the benefits cryptocurrencies could bring.
What do you think about Hester Peirce’s comments and the SEC’s stance on crypto? Let us know in the comments section below.
Image credits: Shutterstock.
Express yourself freely at Bitcoin.com’s user forums. We don’t censor on political grounds. Check forum.Bitcoin.com
<div class="article__body__tags-related"> <div class="article__body__tags-related__tags"> <h6 class="article__body__tags-related__title"> Tags in this story </h6> </div> </div> <div class="article__body__author" readability="33"> <div class="article__body__author__avatar"> <img class="avatar avatar-115 photo" width="64" height="64" src="http://www.scoreit.online/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/IMG_1988-1.jpg"> </div> <div class="article__body__author__info" readability="36"> <h6 class="article__body__author__info__name"> Mathew Di Salvo </h6> <p class="article__body__author__info__about"> A former agency reporter and local news hack, Mathew was thrilled to learn about crypto when he found out it could help him move money abroad – and not get ripped off by banks. He writes for bitcoin.com with a particular focus on banking the unbanked, privacy coins and Latin America.<br></p> </div> </div>